▶ Your Answer :
In the lecture, the speaker contends that the claim suggested in the reading passage is not groundless. This He/She casts doubt on the reading's argument that Sucralose that caused a weight-loss aid can contribute to health problems.
To begin with, the lecturer asserts that it is unlikely that sucralose can cause people to develop diabetes. He points out that other materials, such as potato, also bring about an increase in the production of insulin, but none of people argue that these materials are the key reason for diabetes. Also, people who consume diet soda are tend to be overweight, so their physical factors may lead to diabetes. This is in direct opposition to the reading's point that people who consume sucralose are likely to develop diabetes.
On top of that, the speaker argues that it is doubtful that sucralose creates harmful substances when it is utilized for cooking. What this means is that the experiment offered in the reading passage did not use ingredients in real-life. In addition, experts in the experiment admitted that they boosted temperature too high while conducting the research. This is contradictory to the reading's assertion that it makes toxic substances when used for cooking. Lastly, the lecturer maintains that it is unreasonable that sucralose result in intense allergic reactions. He supports his view by saying that there are no clear evidences to support the views suggested in the reading, so the anecdotal arguments is not reliable. Also, these days, many experts show that it is safer than other types of beverages. This rebuffs the reading passage' insistence that the occurence sucralose is the main cause of intense allergic reactions. is the result of the .
Writing 0–30 score scale: Limited (1-16) / Fair (17-23) / Good (24–30)
1. 각 포인트별로 잘 작성하셨습니다. 2. Introduction입장 정리 다시 한번 더 확인 후 정리해주세요. 3. 기타 Spelling error 주의해주세요. |