▶ Your Answer :
While the author of the reading passage
argues that there are three theories why Michelangelo forged the Laocoon
statute, the lecturer opposes the reading passage’s assertion with different
views.
First
of all, the lecturer contends that the idea about forgery seems baseless.
Forging the Laocoon statue early tells another story. To explain, Michelangelo
needed to prove his talent to be a famous artist. Thus, he made not fake but real
artworks. Besides, although forging an older sculpture to practice, he did not
counterfeit any more and focused on his own work. This casts doubt on the
reading passage’s argument that Michelangelo used to forge various statues.
Additionally,
the speaker points out that the assertion regarding paintings looks mistaken.
There is proof to verify why some similarities appeared on the Laocoon statue.
To be more specific, although Michelangelo drew a figure holding his left side,
the statue showed vice versa. Moreover, his work had a straight torso, while
the sculpture had twisted one. This contradicts the reading passage’s
suggestion that Michelangelo practiced a lot of paintings at the same procedure
as the Laocoon statue.
Finally,
the professor asserts that the opinion related to forging for money is flawed.
It is hasty to conclude by just looking at sponsors. In detail, forgery would
be risky for Michelangelo because he created artworks for royalties. Therefore,
if he had faked someone’s original works, he might have destroyed his fame and
the customers. This goes against the reading passage that Michelangelo forged
renowned masterpiece to earn money for a stable life. |