The reading passage contends that there are numerous plausible explanations for the red rain in Kerala. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this statement.
First of all, the speaker argues that it is improbable that the blood of bats is a lucid reason. If the blood were was the genuine cause, millions of bats must have died simultaneously. However, specialists did not found its remnants such as wings and bones. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that the red rain holds tremendous amounts of bats blood as a study revealed the presence of blood in the rain sample.
In addition, the speaker insists that the theory of volcanic eruption in Philippines is totally absurd because red rain was occurred only in Kerala, not the Philippines. Also, If volcanic eruption had been was to be a concrete cause, it would have also affected other countries, such as Malaysia, Vietnam and even the Philippines. However, red rain is not observed in such countries those countries were not influenced. This counters the reading passage’s assertion that volcanic eruption accounts of the red rain because acidic dust created by eruption moved out directly into the atmosphere of Kerala.
Finally, the lecturer maintains that chemical pollutions cannot be a clear evidence. Since there are a few factories, so it they cannot generate much chemical contaminations. Further, any harmful materials did were not discovered in those areas where hold there are dirty chimneys. This refutes the reading passage’s explanation that the myriad of chemicals made the rain have red color since factories did not made efforts to filter noxious gases, causing which caused the red rain.
Writing 0-30 scale
Fair (23-24)
두 지문의 내용을 잘 정리하고 설명했습니다.
하지만 문법 면에서 오류가 많이 보입니다. 특히 동사의 시제와 형태(능/수동 등)에 주의해주세요. 대명사의 단복수와 관계사(관계대명사/관계부사)도 잘 살펴보세요.