The reading passage and the lecture both talk about a the brain scan lie detector. The author of the reading suggests that the brain scan lie detector is accurate. However, the lecturer rebuffs the reading passage’s arguments by giving three convincing evidences.
To start with, the lecturer asserts that the brain scan lie detector may mistakenly classify true statements as dishonest. To be specific, when a subject is suppressed or embarrassed by sensitive questions or certain situations, he chooses which details to share. This process may be identified as dishonest. However, this view is in direct opposition to the reading that says true statements are not classified as lies with the brain scan lie detector.
On top of that, the lecturer mentions that there is no standard criterion to identify true or false, because each person’s brain differently functions. Therefore, she claims that analyzing process is still required to identify truths, which means that the results may not be accurate. However, it is contrary to the reading passage that suggests that the results are objectively interpreted by the automatic machine.
Finally, the lecturer claims that it is easier for subjects to fool the brain scan lie detector. She supports her idea by suggesting two methods. Subjects can fool it by performing complex mental process or rehearsing their untruthful statements. On the other hand, (두 지문의 대립 관계를 잘 드러내지 못합니다.) the author of the reading asserts that subjects cannot trick the test on purpose.
Writing 0-30 scale
Good (25-26)
전반적으로 문법이나 표현 면에서는 부족함이 없습니다.
listening의 주장도 잘 요약하고 정리했습니다. 다만 reading의 내용을 너무 요약해서 짧게 설명하다보니 두 지문 간의 대립 관계 (특히 listening이 어떤 지점에서 reading을 공격하는지)가 잘 드러나지 않습니다.