The reading passage and the lecture both talk about advertisements. The author of reading believes that there are three kinds of benefits on advertisements. However, the lecturer rebuffs that the reading passage’s arguments by giving three convincing (글쓴이의 가치판단을 쓰지 마세요.) evidences.
To start with, the lecturer claims that advertisements are mainly to sell products not to inform people. Advertisements do not tell people everything in order to sell their products. They often lead people to wrong information, so that people would buy more products more. This goes against the author’s point that advertisements provide good information to people.
On top of that, the speaker asserts that advertisements are expensive. He support his idea by suggesting that it takes a lot of money to advertise products and companies pass those expense on consumers. Therefore, consumers pay extra money on products. However, this contradicts the writer’s assertion that advertisements allow people to access certain services at lower price.
Finally, the lecturer mentions that advertisements are not good in terms of national economy economically (너무 모호한 표현이라 point를 제대로 요약하지 못합니다). He says advertisements make people buy things more than they actually need. And He also states that it they (advertisements=복수형) ultimately pushes people to spend money to the point where people hurt their credits. Certainly, this is not good for general economy. This counters the reading passage’s view that advertisements help national economy.
Writing 0-30 scale
Fair (23-24)
전반적으로 두 글의 내용을 잘 정리하고 요약했습니다. 다만 일부 표현이나 문법에 어색한 부분이 있어서 수정했으니 참고하세요. Integrated Writing에서는 두 글의 내용을 요약, 비교만 하고 글쓴이의 생각은 개입하지 않도록 하세요.