The reading passage and the lecture both talk about flexible working hours. The author of reading believes that there are three kinds of benefits on flexible working hours. However, the lecturer rebuffs that reading passage’s arguments by giving three convincing evidences.
To start with, the lecturer claims that companies could lose money conducting flexible working hours. This is because, if every employees has different working schedules time, there is would be not enough employees working during other companies’ business hours. Furthermore, holding team meetings or doing group projects are almost not impossible. This goes against the author’s point that flexible working hours allow employers to hire the best employees.
On top of that, the speaker assert that employees are not happy with flexible working hours. Since everybody comes to work at the different times, they often feel isolated at work. Not working together means they can not work as a group. Therefore, it is very hard for employees to become friends. However, this contradicts the writer’s assertion that employees will have the best work results and satisfy on their lives since they can manage their own time.
Finally, the lecturer mentions that flexible work hours don’t do not guarantee the employees more time to spend with family. This is because, people set their working hours not the same way their family families do. Consequently, the family cannot spend time together and it can cause lack of quality time with their family families. This counters reading passage’s view that employees are able to improve their lives by spending quality time with family.
Writing 0-30 scale
Fair (22-24)
전반적으로 두 글의 내용은 잘 요약, 정리했습니다. 다만 문법 면에서 아쉬운 점이 보입니다. 가장 크게는 명사의 단/복수와 관사(a/an/the/무관사)에 신경 쓰세요.