▶ Your Answer :
In the lecture, the speaker contends that the methods suggested in the reading passages have some drawbacks. This casts doubt on the reading passage's point that there are viable ways that people can take advantage of coal without harming the environment.
To start with, the lecturer asserts that converting coal into a gas is not beneficial for the environment. He points out that making the coal into the gas requires a lot of fossil fuels fules, and people should use a huge amount of water in order to get rid of impurities from the coal, damaging the environment. This is in direct opposition to the reading's argument that converting coal into the gas is a great solution to help the environment.
On top of that, the speaker argues that using a form of static electricity is not helpful for the environment. What this means is that when people use the static electricity, they can only extract ash particles from pollutants made by the coal that are a minor cause of injuring the environment. To be more specific, people cannot reduce a level of Co2, which is a primary reason for green house effect. 이 부분 detail까지는 필요 없을 것 같아요. 아니면 앞 문장 내용과 합쳐서 더 paraphrasing해도 좋을 것 같아요.This is contradictory contraditory to the reading passage's assertion that people can help the environment by using the form of static electricity.
Lastly, the lecturer maintains that fabric filters cannot be a viable solution for reducing coal's influence. He supports his idea by saying that the fabric filters filiters cannot collect a lot of waste, but they require a lot of maintence maintenance costs, so they are not efficient techniques. This rebuffs the reading's insistence that people can utilize the fabric filters in order to reduce coal's effect.
Integrated Writing Rubrics Score 4.5/5
요약에 필요한 내용들을 잘 파악하신 것 같아요. 통합형은 꼭 필요한 detail만 남겨서 최대한 간결한 요약문을 제시하는 것이 중요하니까, 반복되는 설명이나 불필요한 요소들은 모두 정리해주는 것이 좋아요. paraphrasing이 가능한 부분들은 더 정리해보셔도 좋을 것 같습니다. 오탈자 실수 꼼꼼하게 봐주세요~ 수고 많으셨습니다!
A response at this level is generally good in selecting the important information from the lecture and in coherently and accurately presenting this information in relation to the relevant information in the reading, but it may have minor omission, inaccuracy, vagueness, or imprecision of some content from the lecture or in connection to points made in the reading. A response is also scored at this level if it has more frequent or noticeable minor language errors, as long as such usage and grammatical structures do not result in anything more than an occasional lapse of clarity or in the connection of ideas. |